Your home for intelligent conversation on the web
Library General Continuously read books Continuously read books
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
Continuously read books
What nonreligious book in human history has been most continuously read and studied from?
Continuously should really mean “was referred to as a primary source” rather than as a kind of historical curiosity.
I was lately arguing for Euclid, on the grounds that it was used in British universities until at least the 19th century as a geometry textbook. A friend was  arguing for Plato but again, there’s the word “continuous” – what does it mean? Also there are probably some texts in Eastern traditions to take into account, but I can’t say which – would the Tao te Ching be considered “religious”?
Books Discussed
The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements, Books 1 and 2
by Thomas L. Heath; Euclid
Plato Complete Works
by Plato; John M. Cooper; D. S. Hutchinson
Tao Te Ching: The Definitive Edition
by Lao Tzu

I've just accidentally stumbled upon your question now-it's interesting-mind you the dearth of responses perhaps says something about reading and literature itself....
I don't know what book would be but I imagine there's a few in contention-the ones which you've already named and other obvious ones like Don Quixote,etc.
Whether it would tell us very much about the quality or even the influence of said book is debatable for many reasons-one being that once a book acquires classic status it tends to gain a life of it's own-attracts reverence and rarely gets critically evaluated by too many of us thereafter.Plato is a point in question-those who love/admire hang slavishly on every word as though they were as relevant today as then-they're not-but few feel entitled to say so -when Plato talks of his ' perfect society ',he has a few screws loose,sounds almost fascistic(yea I know the word fascist is wildly overused and often inaccurately and I do appreciate that Plato was important and well ahead of the pack for his time).On the omission of religious texts....I'm not sure that they should be excluded as the very fact that they are still read by a great many serious thinkers in such a scientific age bears testimony to how well put together they actually were even if one is not religious at all.
In the West it would be Aristotle, hands down.

Stock in Plato has wavered, and his influence was channeled into religion via Plotinus and the neo-Platonists, but Aristotle has been the foundation -- love him or hate him -- of the entire Western Canon.

And remember that even in the so-called Dark Ages, Aristotle was preserved and debated in Arabic. He's been the longest-running continuous show since the discovery of fire.

Homer wins if the discussion is strictly Western literature. Which it's not. But which is all I really know...

And if you forget when he wrote, and consider only the range of influence since he left the stage, then it would have to be Shakespeare. Is there actually a second place?

In response to Bryan Szabo
Mind you, Aristotle, also was infused into Christianity. I've heard fairly good arguments in favor of St. Augustine having transferred the essence of Aristotelian philosophy into European culture. Not that it's self-evident, but Augustine clearly used Aristotle's ideas to some extent.

It's actually quite difficult to make a clear-cut separation of religious and secular in all things, because people of faith are not religious only when we go to church, even if you don't see me "preaching".
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

  
Searching
No results found.